Okay, so we would like to begin our study session for city council on Tuesday, January 6th, 2026 at 5.30 p.m. And we have council members Lowry and Lowry who are joining online. The first item of business is the discussion about boundary line adjustments and pull-up sale by Christopher. Thank you. This is just a quick update for the council to know that in the next 30 to 60 days, we'll be bringing two different proposed municipal boundary adjustments with Bluffdale. One is for the access road that will service what's been proposed as the new front runner station in Bluffdale as part of the point project. You may recall, I brought this up I think last meeting or the meeting before but the way the proposed roads are laid out, there's an intersection where two roads that are in Bluffdale meet at an intersection which is in Draper which isn't good. So the proposal would be that we adjust our municipal boundaries so that that intersection is also in Bluffdale, so they have control of that whole road. The second one involves Porter Rockwell Boulevard through the point. The municipal boundary is shown in blue here. The southern part of Port of Rockwell where it meets 146 is actually in Bluffdale. So the proposal would be to move the municipal boundary a short distance to the west so that the whole length of Port of Rockwell from Bangor to 146 is entirely within Draper. We met with Bluffdale and the point before Christmas. And the point is working on getting a survey, a plat, a boundary adjustment plat prepared. Once they've got that prepared, then we will put this back on the agenda for the consideration of a resolution of intent to adjust municipal boundaries on those two parcels. So just giving an update as to where we are in the process. That's it, unless there's any questions. Okay, thank you. Then the next is also by Mr. Barker about the designation of emergency succession of city officers. Okay, so there's a state statute that requires, well, there's a state statute as part of the Emergency Management Act that states that cities have to designate successors for their officers. The statute allows, there's kind of three options. We can do that on a yearly basis by July 1st of each year, designate interim successors for each officer. So for instance, the city manager, city attorney, public works director, etc. If we don't do that by July 1st of each year, the statute defaults into a succession that is established by the legislature. And then there's a third option that we could actually adopt. our succession by ordinance, which probably would be the best option. Since I've been here, unfortunately, we haven't hit that July 1st mark every year. So I'm just bringing this to you to let you know that we'll bring back a list probably in our next meeting, if not the first meeting in February, where we designate emergency successors. Some functions like the fire department and the police department kind of already have a built-in chain of command. So if the chiefs aren't there, there's either a deputy or a captain in place. For Tracy, Spencer's the only other person that is qualified. Although, excuse me, I caught myself just as I looked at Jenny. So there are other successors. But anyways. Without belaboring the point, I'll bring back some options for the council to consider. And the intent will be that we'll follow the current chain of command within each department. So that's all I have. Any questions? Next, it'll be a discussion about the TRSST streetlights. Do you have anything? Yeah. Okay, so you might recall a couple of meetings ago, I had brought up that the board requested that the city take over all maintenance on their street lights. There was some concern from some of the council members that If we were doing that, we'd have to worry about all these different styles of streetlights. I went back and talked to some of our crews. That's not an issue. They already have some on hand. We can easily order them and keep them on inventory. So I met with the board, and we kind of came up with a solution that I'm just looking for to see if you're interested in us pursuing it. So this is the typical streetlight. You can see it's different than our city standard. It's a little bit problematic because the wood tends to rot and this tends to break off. They've refurbished a bunch and they did it kind of ugly so there's some that they've gone back and refixed but the problem is no one understands that they're not our streetlights so they complain to us and then the board is incapable of addressing it in a timely manner. So then they get really frustrated and we're getting yelled at and the residents don't understand. So we came up with this solution. There's roughly 150 streetlights up in the TRSSD. That's a tenth of our total streetlights. So currently what we take care of is our base services. So we're responsible for all the low ground electrical to the street lights, electrical external to the pole assembly, ensuring power supply to the poles, and providing underground repairs and fuse replacements. So if we want to pursue some sort of agreement that we take over responsibility, these are the additional things that we would have to track and charge to an account that would be paid for by the TRSSD money. the maintenance of the streetlights, which would be any poles, foundations, electrical components within the poles. If a pole gets knocked over or the light falls off or there's something in the electrical components that's not working above ground, we would track that. They also requested that we would take a proactive approach to determine the replacement needs for those that were either refurbished poorly or still yet to be replaced. I told them that we don't have any space to store their streetlights, that we would have to use some of their money to build some storage up in Suncrest. The approach that I'm proposing, if we want to, would be we would take over all the streetlight maintenance and TRSSD would be completely out of it. We'd create a new GL for the actual TRS-ST funds to be deposited to annually in an amount upfront. So that we're not doing, I don't know if you guys know with the snow plowing, we have to track everything. It's extremely time consuming, it's complicated, it affects all of us. And then we submit that to them for reimbursement. I don't wanna do that, I wanna take the street lights over. So I just ask for, whether John says the best is, January 1st or July 1st, we get a lump sum up front to take care of these things. We would determine that annually, the initial years being larger amounts to cover the proactive approach and the infrastructure storage needs. And then we would track everything still so that they could audit it if they wanted to, and also so that we could see where we were at in that account fund balance so that we didn't exceed that. And if we did, we'd have to go back That's something. So I'm going to see if that's something the council wants us to move forward with getting an agreement. This has been once we settled with the district and it just became streets or streetlights and plowing. This is the last piece that we knew would ultimately fail. It's not in their wheelhouse. They don't do this type of stuff. tracking or do you do that with the all city lights or would you just be doing it with- No, we do it with all city lights. So we use an asset management software. So the lights are actually already in our software. We do work on them already and we track our amount spent, hours spent, equipment. It would just be that additional stuff we'd make sure we'd separate it to charge . And the TRSD is already, it's part of the tax that they're collecting. is supposed to be covering this. So really what they would do is just pass the portion of the tax they're collecting for streetlights would just come to the city and we would do all the work. And I think what Robert said at the beginning is really important in that everybody just assumes they're city issues and when they don't get replaced or repaired promptly, we're having to point them back at the TRSSD As Robert also pointed out, it isn't very efficient at getting the work done. Another example of the difficulties we have is they'll say, no, it's yours. So then we don't understand what's wrong with it. So we have to pay an electrical company to go out. And a portion of it might be ours. But then another portion is all their stuff. So then they're there. And then we're trying to get reimbursed for these electricians that are really expensive. I have a question on that. Are we collecting enough tax to cover? Do we know? The amount that they're collecting covers streetlights and snow plowing. I'm sure there's years of heavy snow where there might not be enough because that's happened with just reimbursement for snow plowing. There would be those off chances of certain heavy years that there might not be enough. But for the most part, I think it should be good. So Fred, I don't think there's a line item on the tax notice that differentiates between snow plowing and street lighting. It's just one lump sum. So it's their responsibility, obviously, to manage their books and make sure that they're collecting enough tax to meet the obligations that they've got. Okay. I want to make sure that we have it clear to them that it's clear that we'll be now covering so that if we have to make some adjustments, that we can have the chairman take that adjustment. I don't foresee a problem. I just want to make sure we have it covered. The two members I met with, James and Daryl, they really, really want to get out of this. So we'll... We'll have an agreement like we do for snow plowing that will cover this. And we can put in there, Fred, to address that issue of what happens if they fall short or as has happened in the past, their budget gets referred or whatever it is. We'll have it in agreement for how we handle insurance claims for accidents that cause damage. I'll have something in the agreement that would address if these light styles became unavailable or forever to get supplies or the cost went through the roof, that we would present other styles to see if they would like it. We'll make it so it covers all the bases. I just need direction as whether or not you want us to pursue moving forward with that sort of agreement. Yeah, I think so. It makes a lot of sense. My one concern is just that I think you said it won't be an actual like your accounting as much as the snowplow situation is. So my only concern is that they have the money to come in. There's that concern with snowplowing, too. We do the service and then we ask for money. This would be to get the money up front. I mean, of course, if the light gets knocked over, we fix it. If the money had expired, we try to reverse it. It won't be as concerning tracking-wise because it'll be just me worrying about where that billing goes to with finance instead of all the guys having to track their hours and enter it in. That's good. And Fred? Yes, I'm sorry? Are you in favor of moving forward with this? Yes, I am. I think it's good, I guess. I am too. So I just want to get some feedback from the council. On the next step, we've had an encroachment onto a city-owned property. It's on the southeast corner of Third East and Pioneer. This city owns about 5,000 square feet of space. It was acquired in, I think, 96 as part of street improvements. It is encumbered by several utilities. The property owner to the south, the office building to the south has added a decorative wall and landscaping to the property without any city's permission to do so. In discussions with the property owner, he's asked if there's any way that he can keep the improvements or put the city on that. So we wanted to get your guys' feedback on what kind of option you would be open to. I did reach out to all the utility companies to see if they have any issues. Enbridge and Lumen do have a few utility lines that may result in maybe a tree being removed or relocated. There may potentially be some lines along the wall as well that we may need to look into, but all the utility companies generally said they're fine with the landscaping. So the options the city has is to require that all the improvements be removed, allow the improvements to remain subject to the property owner entering a maintenance and liability agreement with the city for those improvements and maintenance. And then, adjusting or removing any improvements that don't meet those clearance standards from Enbridge and Lumen. The third option would be to allow landscaping and irrigation to remain but required that decorative wall to be removed. It's still required that maintenance liability agreement as well as any improvements that don't meet clearance standards from utilities being removed. One concern staff does have with the wall itself is potential enforcement issues with either temporary signs, the plastic signs that get put up all up in the sidewalk. I see this as a big attraction for that and potential for permanent signage to potentially show up. So questions, feedback? I do have a question about, so in the site plan that I saw, it looked like they did have a plan for some landscaping. And so where does that, where exactly? Their property line is right, kind of right to the north of their building. So the landscape plan really showed a couple shrubs adjacent to the building, and that's it. And then everything else is city property. So what you've just shown, Jen, it's about 8 to 10 feet north of their building wall? Or is it even less than that in terms of the property line? No, so their property line is probably only a couple feet away from their building. OK. Yeah. And then the rest is the city property. How do they get approval? How do they get approval to build? The zoning has a zero setback, so they could go up to the property line. Can you show me the options that you said? Did they realize when they were building the sign that it was off the property line? Yes, they were aware. And to be clear, the decorative wall, the Jays' property owner, he said he doesn't plan on putting a sign on it, that it's just a decorative wall. My concern is it becomes an enforcement issue down the line. Yeah, I mean, they know that they were in the pro team. I mean, I'm just trying to figure out why you would allow them to keep the wall up. So that's why I'm asking if there's specific feedback if you guys want the wall removed, if you want all of the improvements removed as we go back and work with this adjacent property owner. I think a question I had, too, was we see this in various places, like up by my neighborhood and that back highland. And I think several years ago, the city came in, but I don't remember what the resolution was. If people had to remove stuff, if they could buy the property. I know they can't buy here because there's utilities. But what are some other ways we've resolved this in the past? I think there have been some areas where people have purchased property. I don't think that's something we've done recently. We've also enforced on making people remove improvements. I don't know if you know that. Those are probably the two main things that we've done. We usually ask them to remove that. My concern is I didn't realize their business sign was on our property. Is that a business sign? No. What's that sign? It's just on the building. So their business sign is, well, they have a real estate for lease sign. Oh, okay, that's for lease. I wasn't sure what that sign was. If I go to the area, their permanent signage is down here. That's what concerns me is having any kind of signage on our property, regardless of whether it's permanent or just temporary for lease. We don't want to get into the business of allowing people to use our property to advertise their businesses or that type of thing. That's my concern with the wall. It's inviting. Okay, so I would, I would, I would, I would agree. I don't, I think allowing that would be setting a precedent for us to be able to utilize this property. So are you saying to remove the wall? What about the landscaping? Are we going to be responsible for maintaining that landscaping? The adjacent parkway would have to enter into a maintenance liability agreement with the city and they would do the maintenance, landscape and irrigation. I don't have as much harm with the landscape. I'm sorry. Go ahead. I think it looks nice. And so I think having to take out all the landscaping, I'm like, well, I don't know. It would be interesting to see what it looked like when it's just city. And so I don't necessarily have a problem with that. I think it's great, especially if he's going to have to enter into an agreement that says he's going to take care of it. I'm not sure there's something that I'm not understanding here, but that seems like a good thing. a win for us. I do think like signage on the city property is a bad idea and something in that agreement should make sure to, if he is maintaining it. I would agree with Katherine on this. I think the landscaping definitely. Sorry, Tasha, you're cutting out a little bit. Well, I agree with Patrick. So keep the landscaping, but ask them to remove the wall. Yes. And any signage. They just can't have signage in our right of way. Yes. Fred, is that where you are too? Yes, I'm in agreement with that too. Bring back an agreement to final through was. Yeah. Okay. Yeah, I'll, I'll, I'll get with a, a state property owner and we'll work towards an agreement. Thank you, Jen. Okay, so the last item on the agenda is council manager reports. Missing anything? Did you want, do you want to hear from staff or do you want to see if the council members have? Yeah, we can, we can. Okay. Mike just asked me to share, as part of the Draper Wellness Coalition, we are working with Salt Lake County Health to offer a public training. And it'll be Wednesday, January 28th here at City Hall from 7 to 8.30 PM. Our area of focus for this quarter is suicide prevention and gun safety. And so the county will be here providing a QPR training, which is question, persuade, refer. It's a method that is known to be effective to help prevent suicide. And in conjunction with that, our police department has received a grant, not really a grant, a donation of free gun safes. So we are going to combine a giveaway of the gun safes with this event. There'll be, I think, 10 available. And there's a waiver that people have to sign. And then I think our community policing unit is going to do a drawing just among the attendees that night. So I just wanted to make you aware of that and let me know if you have any concerns. Did you say the 28th? Yes. OK. I just wanted to give an update on our ongoing Pump Station 3 project. The first shutdown of the transmission line will be next Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. So similar to if any of you were here in the winter of 22-23 when we replaced the vaults on Traverse Ridge Road, there's a 24-inch transmission line that goes to the top that was having issues on the vaults and stuff so we fixed all that but now this project project is to add additional pump capacity to the pump station which is a state law we have to have five pumps not three we have to have at least one backup and we can use four so the first phase is next week pending any unforeseen things but we fill the tanks all up on top of the mountain and we've calculated how many We monitor it the whole time. We have engineering and public works staff driving around. It's a 24-hour shift starting Tuesday through Thursday. This main focus of the first shutdown So we'll probably be doing some public relations messaging to say, hey, you're on tank water. Keep an eye out. Don't abuse. Don't overuse. People aren't watering, so we should be fine. In 22-23, I think our longest shutdown was five and a half days. We'll have additional shutdowns through the winter. Probably February or early March will be a five-day shutdown, which will be a lot more complicated and difficult. We'll have to drain the whole line, replace a bunch of valving, lots of welding. But it's not out in the summer. We started a big project today. As you walked in, you probably saw. Six to eight weeks for that to be completed, but we're seeing good progress already. Is your area secure overnight, or is the visqueen kind of keeping everybody out? It's the visqueen at the moment. But we have installed a lock on the inside closet door where we put everything that needs Anything from any council members? I don't have anything right now. Tasha's on her way over. Oh, okay. So we still have a quorum. She's on her way over. Okay, so if that's everything, then we get a little break. Do we do a motion? No. Okay, just break until 7 o'clock. It's 7 o'clock. We'd like to go ahead and get our meeting started. I'd like to welcome you all to our City Council meeting this evening. We'll go ahead and start with our flag ceremony and Pledge of Allegiance by Cub Scout Troop 4444. Guard attention. Audience attention. Will the audience please rise? Color Guard advance. Cub Scout salute. Color Guard halt. Color Guard, post the colors. Color Guard, salute. Please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, Two, color guard dismissed. The audience may be seated. Thank you, troop, for doing that for us. That was really special. Oh, would you guys like to take a picture up here? The troop, would you guys all like to come and take a picture? Okay, the next item on the agenda is a proclamation for Religious Freedom Day. I'll go ahead and read that. Whereas the United States Congress in 1992 set aside January 16th as Religious Freedom Day to honor the passage of the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom in 1786, and whereas Religious Freedom Day has been recognized by presidential and state proclamations annually, and whereas many of the first immigrants to our nation came to these shores motivated by their desire for religious liberty so that they could worship according to the dictates of their own consciences, and our forefathers saw fit to protect and support freedom of religion by establishing it in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, and whereas those of faith and those of no faith have common goals of unity, love, service, mutual civility, and a desire to live true to belief and conscience, and whereas we seek mutual respect and fairness to all, and whereas we invite others to defend freedom of religion, including the longstanding Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Now, therefore, I, Bryn Heather Johnson, Mayor Pro Tem of Draper City, State of Utah, along with the members of the Draper City Council, do hereby proclaim January 16th 2026 as Religious Freedom Day and urge all residents to reflect upon and respect the importance of religious liberty for all. And I just want to state that the mayor is attending some oath of office ceremony, so he could not be here today. And Council Member Green is away on active duty. and Council Member Lowry has called in. So that's where we are today. Okay, the next item is public comments. So if anybody would like to come up and give a public comment, they are restricted to items that are listed on this, that are not listed on this or a future agenda, and they are limited to three minutes per person. Is there anyone here who would like to make a public comment this evening? OKAY. NOT SEEING ANYONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO OUR NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS NUMBER 5, THE CONSENT ITEMS. ITEM NUMBER 5A IS APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 16, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. ITEM 5B IS APPROVE RESOLUTION 26-01. ITEM 5C IS TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 26-02. Item 5D is to approve resolution 26-04. Item 5E is to approve ordinance number 1698. Madam Mayor Pro Tem, may I make a motion to approve the consent calendar? Is there a second? I'll second. Okay, so we had a motion by Ms. Lowry. So how do you, and a second by Ms. Dolan to Ms. Lowry. How do you vote? Yes. Ms. Dolan? Yes. And Ms. Johnson? Yes. Does Fred? Oh, Fred, sorry. Fred? Mr. Lowry? Yeah. How do you vote? Yeah. Okay, thank you. Sorry about that one. Okay, so the item has been passed unanimously. So we'll go ahead and move on to item six, which is items for council consideration. And the first item is a public hearing. And that's ordinance number 1697. It's an ordinance amending the official zoning map of Draper City for approximately 1.04 acres of property from RA1 to R3. And it's located approximately 283 East Tanager Lane. And it's known as the Butler Zoning Map. And Paul Gaiman is going to present for us. Thank you. So we'll get right into it. So we have our vicinity map. We are located just west of 300 East and just north of Browns Pond. And like we said, we're off of Tanager Way. We go for a closer area. We can see Browns Pond in the bottom left. So we are the corner lot there off of Tanager and 300 East. Taking a look at the land use, so the proposed zone change for R3 zoning is compatible with the current land use of residential medium density. Take a look at the zoning maps. We are currently zoned RA1. There is R3 to the east, RA2 to the south, RA1 and R3 to the north, and RA1 to the west. So looking at overview of the request, so the proposed zoning is 13,000 square foot minimum lot size. The RA1 that it currently is is 40,000 square foot minimum lot sizes. So looking at the lot of this acreage, which is 1.04 acres, that translates to 45,300 square feet. So looking at subdividing in the R3 zone, it would be able to do potentially three lots, but with the nature of being a classified street, they wouldn't be able to have access off of there. So everything would have to come off of Tanager. So it would be tricky. So theoretically, three lots would be possible, but it would be tricky. We do have some site photos there. And then planning commission results. So the planning commission reviewed this item at the December 11th, 2025 meeting and forwarded a positive recommendation for the application with a vote of 5-0. I am available for any comments. We also have the applicant, Linnea, and her father, the property owner here, that they can also answer any questions as needed. Okay, thank you. Any questions at this point? I'll go ahead and open it to public comments. If there's anyone here who would like to make a comment on this issue, please come forward and state your name and your address, and your time will start in about three minutes. Jacob Goodrich, address is 259 Tanager Lane, so immediately to the west of the Butlers, and I just want to say I'm fully in support of this. Great neighbors, love to see the approval. Thank you, is there anyone else here? Okay, would the applicant like to say anything, address the council? So considering what staff has stated, what is your intent, to subdivide into three? So presently I'm only looking to subdivide and develop the northwest parcel, and it would come in off Tanager Lane. Okay. So it's kind of the back corner. Can we pull that up? And would you go ahead and state your name for the record? Sorry, Linnea Butler, and it's my parents' property. Yeah, so I would be developing this corner right here with access to Tanager here. And this might be a question for Paul, actually. You mentioned that they couldn't have access from 300 East. Can you, I apologize, I don't know, can you tell me why it would need to be off of Tanager? Yeah, for sure. So in discussions with the engineering department, specifically Brian Maxfield, Third East is a classified road, so either a collector or an arterial street. And so if subdivided, engineering department would not allow access to come from Third East being a collector or an arterial street. So they would have to provide access off of Tanager through either a private lane or flag lot, something like that. Sorry, Paul, does that mean that whatever's currently on 30th is the limit of is off 30th? So currently they have one curb cut off of 30th on the northeast corner. But in talking with Brian, if they did the subdivision, that curb cut would go away. They wouldn't be able to have that access. Everything would come off of Tanager. So I'm curious if your intent is only to subdivide into two lots, why have you requested RA3? THREE OF US, THREE SIBLINGS. I HAVE TWO, A BROTHER AND A SISTER. SO A THIRD WOULD GO TO EACH OF US AS FAR AS ESTATE PLANNING PURPOSES. BUT I INTEND TO BUILD ON THE NORTHWEST LOT SOONER THAN THAT, SOONER THAN MY SIBLINGS WOULD WANT THEIR INHERITANCE, JUST FOR MY PARENTS, TO BE NEAR MY PARENTS AS THEY GET OLDER. AND I MIGHT ASK A QUESTION, TOO. IS THIS A NEW AMENDMENT? Can we make sure that we get all of this on the record by speaking into the mics, both for the applicant and for Paul, please? Sorry. Thank you. I'm just curious about all the other subdivisions down 300 East that dump on 300 East. Anybody know? I mean, there's one Not a quarter of a mile down, so I I can help answer answer that so. When you're subdividing property and creating new property, all the access points have to comply with our code for classified roads. We don't allow individual driveways. If your property only had frontage on 30s, you'd be able to have a private road that comes off 30s. Because you do have access to Tanager, you'd be required to have your access off Tanager. Because the one I'm thinking of backed on the lake, and they had to go out on 300 East. That answers my question. Okay, any further questions? Can we pull up the map again of the different zoning in the area? Jacob our neighbor owns see this strip right here can anybody hear me this strip right here he also owns this lot and at some point him being much younger but at some point he's planning on developing this and this will be the access to it so He is willing to give us a right-of-way there for Tanager Lane, and possibly we can work out something from this lot to get to that right-of-way. That's our thinking, but I'd have to ask Paul about that. Okay. Do you want to address that? I have a question on that then. with that access, then would that mean that's where you would get three lots? So this is new information to staff. This has not been gone over. The subdivision obviously hasn't been mapped out. So I can't speak to whether or not they'd be able to get the access off of that extra land. All that we've been discussing is the 283 East. can't speak for what future plans they have, that would be something that would be considered at a later date. If there was a flag lot there, Paul or Jen, would that count towards the square footage of a lot or is that excluded from the square footage of the lot? Flag lots, the stem on the flag lot counts towards your minimum lot size if you have something like a private road, that does not count towards your minimum lot size. Any further questions? Okay, thank you. Can we turn this over to the council for consideration? I'M NOT SURE AT THIS POINT THAT WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION NECESSARY TO MOVE FORWARD ON THIS ONE. MY INCLINATION IS STILL THAT THIS MIGHT BE BETTER AS AN RA2. AND I'M A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS NEW INFORMATION THAT'S JUST COMING FORWARD ABOUT THE ACCESS. I'M WONDERING IF WE COULD CONTINUE THIS TO THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING AND GET A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION. I WOULD MAKE THAT MOTION, PASHA OR SECOND. that motion from you. I think it would be, I would be in favor of continuing this because I always state concern if it's only going to be two lots on that. I don't, doesn't make any sense to me to make it an RA3. We should make it an RA2. But with this new information, I think we need to make sure that that is feasible. Can I ask a question? Is the reason that you're looking, well, I guess you, did tell us that you eventually hope to do three, but the build that you're hoping to do in the northwest corner would be not a half-size lot. So I think that's why they're looking for RA3 now, even though they don't know what happens in the future because of the size of the lot that she's hoping to build on now. Yeah, I'm guessing that's why. The access to that lot would presumably be through this corridor that hasn't been contemplated by staff. Yeah, I would assume that it would be on their existing lot, given the information that we received. Right, but they're saying no, it would be through the neighbors. No, no, no, no. Sorry, if I can speak. I don't know if I'm allowed to speak. Yes, go right ahead. So right now, the plan is to have access up the west side of that red square off of Tanager Lane, a private drive. If that's not a viable option, we have the second option that we'll fall back on. There's plenty of land there to do the access, the drive up the west side of my parents' property and have me live in the back there. But if for some reason the city says, no, we're not going to let you do that or whatever, we will go to the route of, so that's like our secondary position. So if you guys do want more information and want to continue this, I'd ask that you kind of provide us what information you'd like us to bring back. One thing with this being a rezone, we aren't, in the design phase for a subdivision at this point. We don't have engineering drawings, a survey, anything like that to clarify exactly how many lots they'd be able to get, what kind of design there would be. Okay. Council, do you have a recommendation or a motion? I'm not ready to move forward on this one until we have a little more information about the access point and how all of the access for three separate units would be coming off of Tanager. I would move to continue it to the next city council meeting. I'll second that motion. Okay, so we have a motion by Ms. Lowry and a second by Mr. Lowry. Ms. Lowry, how do you vote? Yes. Mr. Lowry, how do you vote? Yeah. Ms. Dolan, how do you vote? Yes. And Ms. Johnson votes yes. So this item will be continued up to a later date. To clarify, the motion was to continue to the next City Council meeting. Yes. Okay, the next item on our agenda is to approve Resolution 26-03. WHICH IS A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE DRAPER CITY 2026 COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN AND LOGISTICS ANNEX, AND THE STAFF REPORT IS BY NICK ROBLE. GOOD EVENING. TONIGHT I'LL BE PRESENTING THE COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN AND THE LOGISTICS ANNEX. MY NAME IS NICK ROBLE. I'M THE EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR FOR DRAPER CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT. SO THE PURPOSE TONIGHT IS TO PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT And what that does is outlines the framework for managing disasters and major emergencies within Draper City. It also identifies department responsibilities and the coordination that will occur. So it was developed in compliance with FEMA, Utah code, the NIM system, and the incident command system. And what it does is it establishes the framework to coordinate emergency response, recovery, preparedness, and mitigation operations that will take place. The scope of the plan, it applies to all Draper City departments. DESCRIBES HOW WE'LL COORDINATE WITH COUNTY, STATE, AND FEDERAL AGENCIES, AND ALSO OUR INTEGRATION WITH SALT LAKE COUNTY AND UTAH COUNTY DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. AND IT WAS BASED ON THE SALT LAKE COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN THAT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED BY FEMA. SO SOME OF THE OBJECTIVES, WANT TO ESTABLISH SCALEABLE COMMAND AND CONTROL STRUCTURES, DEFINE OUR OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES ACROSS ALL DEPARTMENTS, IDENTIFY KEY ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND RESOURCE COORDINATION, SUPPORT CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT AND OPERATIONS and build community preparedness and resilience. So our concept of operations, our operational priorities, number one is always life safety. Then we're gonna look to stabilize the incident, protect property and the environment, establish our community lifelines, and our continuity of government. So some of the preparedness activities that are gonna be in our focus area. We're gonna regularly update the plan and our continuity of operations plan integration, our training and exercises, and baseline FEMA, ICS and NIMS training for our staff, including public outreach and education. So some of our response operations are key actions, establish a common operating procedure, coordinate all public information through our joint information center, conduct damage assessments, request mutual aid and resources as necessary, and support community protective actions and evacuations when necessary. Our recovery operations, once we transition from response to recovery, Hazard containment, lifeline stabilization, and initial damage assessments. And then we'll move into a recovery task force, which coordinates recovery priorities and activates our recovery support functions and develops long-term recovery plan. Our implementation and maintenance are going to be reviewed annually by Draper City Emergency Management. It will be updated every three years or post-incident or exercised with lessons learned. We're gonna integrate with our department continuity of operations plan and continuous improvement through after action reports. And moving on to the logistics annex, the purpose of that is to ensure that our responders have the people, equipment, facilities, and supplies needed to operate within the response, and it supports all city departments during emergencies and planned events. It applies to short duration incidents, extended multi-day emergencies, and large scale evacuations and disasters. Some of our core capabilities, We'll be able to have resource requests, ordering and tracking, staging areas and facilities for responder support, transportation and shelter support, vendor mutual aid and partner coordination, and integration with county and state logistics systems. That concludes my presentation. Does anyone have any questions? No, just thank you so much for your work on this. Absolutely. We've been really wanting a very thorough emergency plan for a long time, so it is so great to see this being developed and implemented. I agree with this, Laurie. I was really impressed as I read through the information. I did have a question about how we were planning on getting some of this information out to the public. For instance, in the plan, I noticed that it mentioned it takes about 96 hours to get help and encouraging people to have a kit for 92 hours. And I always do the bare minimum, so I have 72, which is what I had heard previously. So how are we going to get information like that out to our residents? So we're going to be building our public and our private relationships, working with the public, conducting workshops, conducting training to let them know this is what we expect of them and what they should expect of us as a municipal response. That sounds great. Thank you. Anyone else have any questions? Thank you so much. Thank you. Okay, I'd like to turn it over to the council. Do I have a motion to approve? I'll make a motion. I motion that we approve Resolution 2603. I'll second it. Okay, so we have a motion by Ms. Dolan and a second by Ms. Lowry. Ms. Dolan, how do you vote? Yes. Ms. Lowry, how do you vote? Mr. Lowry, how do you vote? Yeah. And Ms. Johnson votes yes. That brings us to number eight on our agenda. Can I get a motion for adjournment? So moved. Second. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye.